Here at PJ Media, we’ve lately seen both sides weigh in about civil asset forfeiture by law enforcement. Megan Fox expressed her perception that police often take what they shouldn’t, and Jack Dunphy defended the practice as employed by police departments across the nation. Livingstone, who helped write the statute, stated he believed police departments have been filing forfeiture spending stories to the treasurer’s office, till WBUR informed him that’s not the case.
I’ve heard stories from officers that I worked round and most of them are some shady m effers. I assume Snowden made that clear, however I’d prefer to add that on a metropolis or town stage it is 100 times worse than Snowden’s disclosure and there are many shady tech/security guys greater than prepared to promote their souls for a fast buck. How is that this shit even legal these mfkers are public servants paid by town / county and so forth. Using these stingrays is pretty dodgy irrespective of where the money comes from. It will all the time lead to the police gathering private information on tons of of folks that don’t have anything to do with the case at hand.
It can pinpoint someone’s location right down to a particular room of a lodge or home. At the time, the FBI deemed cell web site simulators so specialized that it prohibited Boston police and different law enforcement from talking about the devices publicly, specifically with the media. Regardless of where any of us stands on civil forfeiture, we might typically surprise what police departments do with the money they’ve seized from raids and investigations. In Massachusetts, police departments maintain the cash they seize more often than not — even when no expenses stem from the investigation — and the rules on how they can spend that money are lax.
We should most likely change the phrasing from black to one thing else, although. The favored solutions for “fairness points” usually contain jobs for left activists or NGOs – “defund the police” transmutes into “we’d like half a department value school district investigates longtime teachers of varied flavors of social staff”. The “proper” does not should construct it’s own infrastructure, loads of proper wing media personalities and publications preserve a presence on Facebook/Twitter/etc…
“We just wouldn’t have enough gamers to field a staff,” he said. Councilor Arroyo is a co-sponsor of a model new metropolis ordinance barring BPD from buying new surveillance technology without first receiving approval from the town council. He stated the communities being surveilled deserve to be a half of the dialogue across the equipment and technology affecting them. In unclassified documents obtained by MuckRock.com, the FBI in 2013 prohibits Boston police from speaking to the public, particularly members of the media, about cell site simulator technology.